Scholars for 9/11 Truth



Wisconsin politicians display ignorance, paranoia, and pandering, Scholars say

Madison, WI (PRWEB) October 12, 2006 --- The Governor of Wisconsin, Jim Doyle, and his GOP rival, Mark Green, both want to fire a controversial instructor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for holding views about 9/11 they donât like. Kevin Barrett, a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, is discussing 9/11 and its impact on relations between the US and Islam in a course on Islam he is offering this semester.Ê


Barrett has now inflamed political passions by drawing comparisons between Adolf Hitler and George W. Bush in a forthcoming essay. ãLike Bush and the neocons, Hitler and the Nazis inaugurated their new era by destroying an architectural monument and blaming its destruction on their designated enemies,ä he writes, where the Twin Towers played a role parallel to that of the German Reichstag.


ãThat may sound like an exaggeration if you have never studied what happened on 9/11,ä observed James Fetzer, the founder of the scholarsâ society, ãbut what we have discovered lends considerable weight to the parallel.Ê The Twin Towers, for example, were brought down by special kinds of controlled demolition, not by the impact of the planes, the jet-fuel-based fires, or any kind of pancake collapse.äÊ


According to Fetzer, the buildings were designed to withstand the impact of similar large commercial airliners, the jet-fuel-based fires burned too low and too briefly to even weaken, much less melt, the steel, and no ãpancakingä occurred.Ê ãIndeed, the buildings were being blown apart from the top down.Ê Steel beams were being blown outward and even upward.Ê The buildings were destroyed in 10 and 9 seconds, which is even faster than free fall and would have been impossible without explosives.ä


ãBush himself has acknowledged that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the events of 9/11,ä Fetzer added.Ê ãThe Senate Intelligence Committee has released a study showing that Saddam had no ties with Osama bin Laden.Ê And the FBI has acknowledged that it has Îno hard evidenceâ connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11.Ê If neither Saddam nor Osama had anything to do with 9/11ä, he asked, ãthen who was responsible? The Bush administration has been lying to us about 9/11 from scratch.ä


Comparisons between Hitler and Bush do not originate with Barrett, Fetzer said.Ê ãIf you google ÎBush Hitlerâ, for example, you will get 11 million hits.Ê Try ÎThe Gallery of Bush-Hitler Allusionsâ and you will find hundreds of others who have found parallels between them, including comparisons of The Patriot Act and The Enabling Act, which enabled Hitler, who had been democratically elected, to consolidate his power.Ê And both launched wars in violation of international law and condoned the use of torture.ä


Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which Fetzer founded in mid-December, is dedicated to exposing falsehoods and revealing the truth about the events of 9/11, ãletting the chips fall where they may.äÊ Its members include physicists, mechanical engineers, civil engineers, structural engineers, aeronautical engineers, and pilots, as well as many with backgrounds in the social sciences and the humanities.Ê Fetzer himself has a Ph.D. in the history and philosophy of science and has published 27 books.


ãThe situation is even more bizarre because these politicians donât know why Kevin holds these beliefs and refuse to look at the evidence, even though it is abundant and easily accessible.äÊ He offered Steve Nass (R-Whitewater) and Scott Suder (R-Abbotsford), members of the state legislature, as prime examples.Ê Nass has even tried to pass legislation to have Barrett fired, but was unable to round up enough votes.Ê ãKevin can be provocative, but that doesnât make him wrong,ä Fetzer said.


Bill Douglas, an expert on parenting fascinated by the controversy, after discovering that about 1/3 of the American people doubt the official account, recently contacted Nassâs office to ask if anyone there had reviewed the studies of 9/11 presented on the Scholarsâ web site at, only to be told that was something they would certainly not do, because anyone who holds views like that must be a "Bush hater."

Douglas was dumbfounded by their response. ãThey want to fire a university teacher for presenting facts, many of which are readily available on that web site÷facts that they dispute, yet have no idea what those facts are÷and are unwilling to look at them to find out what they are, which is insane. This kind of delusional paranoia by elected officials is of particular concern.äÊ Indeed, this degree of detachment from reality raises serious questions about their competence for public office, he said.


ãSuderâs case,ä Fetzer added, ãis even more outrageous.Ê He claims that conspiracy theories are incapable of scientific study.Ê This means he has never visited our site.Ê He has never read any of the peer-reviewed articles we have archived there.Ê He doesnât understand that our objective is to take rumor and speculation out of the case and place it on an objective and scientific foundation.Ê After 35 years teaching logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, itâs safe to say I know the difference.ä


ãSuder even claims that Barrettâs forthcoming book, Î9/11 and the American Empire:Ê Muslims, Jews and Christians Speak Out,â is anti-Semitic, ostensibly on the ground it includes harsh criticism of the nation of Israel,ä Fetzer said. ãNot only does his book include several essays by noted Jewish scholars but criticism of Israel only qualifies as Îanti-Semitismâ if it is confused with prejudice against persons who happen to be Jewish. Criticism of Israel, of its government or of its policies is not anti-Semitism.äÊ


ãAnti-Semitism is morally objectionable. False allegations like this one deserve to be scorned. These politicians donât care about the truth but appear to be pandering for votes,ä Fetzer said. The University, however, continues to express support for Kevin for encouraging his students to think about these issues from diverse perspectives.Ê ãI am proud of UW-M for standing up to political pressure and defending academic freedom, which means nothing if you are only allowed to express popular opinions.ä



James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

Founder and Co-Chair

Scholars for 9/11 Truth

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. (

©2007 Scholars for 9/11 Truth - Questions? Contact Us